🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising group of nations are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader stating that mobile devices and networks are "stealing our kids' youth". Legislation may be passed next year.
• Norway is set to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an similar ban could be "one of the options in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on the legislature to enact a law raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a similar step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has recommended families to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is given. Although it cautions of the "addictive" design of these apps, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age restriction is a useful foundation," commented the MEP behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a future ban, stating that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in robust data".

Previously, support gathered behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the government committed to investigate the issue.

Charities have expressed concerns. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after encountering disturbing platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban might not protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are safe and suitable for minors," stated a prominent peer.

The United States: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, action is primarily happening at the state level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra access needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted laws demanding guardian approval for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and calls from some politicians to mimic Australia's example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Apart from Europe and the US, additional states are likewise exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for Instagram to 16.

But, international organizations adopt a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might have unintended consequences". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

While this international discussion continues, the policies of Australia and several other countries show that governments around the world are no longer willing to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.